The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced us many harsh classes. Importantly, it has proven us how straightforward it’s to fabricate panic and control entire populations through deceptive means. Topping the checklist of misleading methods is using a take a look at that falsely labels wholesome people as sick and infectious. This permits mass testing to drive the narrative that we’re in a deadly pandemic.
Of course, I am speaking in regards to the now notorious reverse transcription polymerase chain response (RT-PCR) take a look at. The very fact is, the PCR take a look at isn’t designed to be used as a diagnostic device because it can not distinguish between inactive viruses and “stay” or reproductive ones.1
This can be a essential level, since inactive and reproductive viruses will not be interchangeable by way of infectivity. If in case you have a nonreproductive virus in your physique, you’ll not get sick and you can’t unfold it to others. Secondly, many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many instances, which leads to wholesome folks testing “optimistic.”
The Essential Element That Nullifies Most PCR Check Outcomes
The video above explains how the PCR take a look at works and the way we’re deciphering outcomes incorrectly. In abstract, the PCR swab collects RNA out of your nasal cavity. This RNA is then reverse transcribed into DNA. As a result of its tiny dimension, it should be amplified to change into discernible. Every spherical of amplification known as a cycle, and the variety of amplification cycles utilized by any given take a look at or lab known as a cycle threshold (CT).
The upper the CT, the larger the danger that insignificant sequences of viral DNA find yourself being magnified to the purpose that the take a look at reads optimistic even when your viral load is extraordinarily low or the virus is inactive and poses no menace to you or anybody else.
Many scientists have famous that something over 35 cycles is scientifically indefensible.2,3,4 A September 28, 2020, examine5 in Scientific Infectious Ailments revealed that once you run a PCR take a look at at a CT of 35 or larger, the accuracy drops to three%, leading to a 97% false optimistic price.
But, a take a look at often known as the Corman-Drosten paper and assessments really useful by the World Well being Group are set to 45 cycles,6,7,8 and the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration and the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention suggest working PCR assessments at a CT of 40.9
The query is why, contemplating the consensus is that CTs over 35 render the take a look at ineffective. When labs use these extreme cycle thresholds, you clearly find yourself with a grossly overestimated variety of optimistic assessments, so what we’re actually coping with is a “casedemic”10,11 — an epidemic of false positives.
Many at the moment are questioning whether or not this was completed on function to crash the worldwide economic system and present cowl for the implementation of what is often known as the Great Reset, which is nothing lower than a global totalitarian takeover by unelected technocrats who search to gobble up all of the world’s belongings.
Certainly, it appears fairly clear we’re not coping with a deadly pandemic in any actual sense. Mortality statistics additional show that is the case, as general mortality statistics have remained secure in 2020 and consistent with earlier years.12,13,14
In different phrases, individuals are dying from COVID-19, sure, however the sickness isn’t killing an extra variety of folks. The identical variety of folks would have died anyway, from one thing. Certainly, CDC information15 launched August 26, 2020, confirmed solely 6% of so-called COVID-19 deaths had COVID-19 listed as the only real trigger on the demise certificates.
“For deaths with situations or causes as well as to COVID-19, on common, there have been 2.6 further situations or causes per demise,” the CDC said, and any a type of comorbidities might have killed these folks even when COVID-19 was nonexistent.
For Accuracy, A lot Decrease CTs Should Be Used
Now, if CTs above 35 are scientifically unjustified, simply how low of a CT needs to be used? Fairly a few research have investigated this, so there is no scarcity of knowledge at this level. The truth that the WHO, FDA and CDC nonetheless haven’t modified their CTs downward in mild of all these information tells us they don’t seem to be inquisitive about getting an correct image of the an infection price.
For instance, an April 2020 examine16 within the European Journal of Scientific Microbiology & Infectious Ailments confirmed that to get 100% confirmed actual positives, the PCR take a look at should be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically.
By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy price is a mere 20%, that means 80% are false positives. Past 34 cycles, your likelihood of a optimistic PCR take a look at being a true optimistic shrinks to zero.
Extra not too long ago, a December 3, 2020, systematic evaluate17 printed within the journal of Scientific Infectious Ailments assessed the findings of 29 totally different research — all of which had been printed in 2020 — evaluating proof of SARS-CoV-2 an infection with the CTs utilized in testing.
As reported by the authors, “12 research reported that CT values had been considerably decrease … in specimens producing stay virus tradition.” In different phrases, the upper the CT, the decrease the prospect of a optimistic take a look at really being as a result of presence of stay (and infectious) virus.
“Two research reported the percentages of stay virus tradition diminished by roughly 33% for each one unit improve in CT,” the authors famous. Importantly, 5 of the research included had been unable to establish any stay viruses in instances the place a optimistic PCR take a look at had used a CT above 24. What’s extra, as a way to produce stay virus tradition, a affected person whose PCR take a look at used a CT at or above 35 needed to be symptomatic.
So, to summarize, if in case you have signs of COVID-19 and take a look at optimistic utilizing a PCR take a look at that was run at 35 amplification cycles or larger, then you might be prone to be contaminated and infectious.
Nevertheless, for those who would not have signs, but take a look at optimistic utilizing a PCR take a look at run at 35 CTs or larger, then it’s seemingly a false optimistic and also you pose no danger to others as you are unlikely to hold any stay virus. In actual fact, offered you are asymptomatic, you are unlikely to be infectious even for those who take a look at optimistic with a take a look at run at 24 CTs or larger.
Fearmongering Success Hinges on Incorrect Use of PCR Check
The video above consists of a number of interviews with specialists who’ve overtly criticized using PCR testing to diagnose infections akin to COVID-19. These embrace:
The inventor of the PCR take a look at, the late Kary Mullis (he has spoken in regards to the take a look at for different infections, akin to HIV, however died in August 2019, just a few months earlier than the COVID-19 pandemic broke out)
Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug firm Pfizer
Professor Carl Heneghan, director of the Oxford College Middle for Proof-Primarily based Medication
Emeritus professor of immunology Beda M. Stadler, former head of the Bern Institute of Immunology
Clare Craig, a advisor pathologist
Stephen A. Bustin, professor of molecular drugs and a world-renowned knowledgeable on the PCR take a look at
In 1993, Mullis spoke about using the PCR take a look at to diagnose HIV. He defined that every one the take a look at does is amplify molecules into one thing you’ll be able to detect, however it can not inform you whether or not these particles really pose a danger to your well being.
He additionally factors out that, utilizing PCR, you’ll be able to basically discover absolutely anything in anybody as a result of most of us are strolling round with pathogens of all types, however the load is both too low to be of concern or the particles are simply lifeless particles that pose no danger.
Bustin factors out that once you get a optimistic consequence utilizing a CT of 35 or larger, you are wanting on the equal of a single copy of viral DNA. The chance of that inflicting a well being downside is minuscule. Even Dr. Anthony Fauci has admitted that utilizing a PCR take a look at with a CT above 35 renders it kind of ineffective as a result of at that time, you are simply detecting lifeless nucelotides. No stay virus could be detected at CTs that prime.
Deadly Errors Present in Paper on Which PCR Testing Is Primarily based
November 30, 2020, a staff of twenty-two worldwide scientists printed a evaluate18 difficult the scientific paper19 on PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 written by Christian Drosten, Ph.D., and Victor Corman. The Corman-Drosten paper was shortly accepted by the WHO and the workflow described therein was adopted as the usual the world over.
In keeping with Reiner Fuellmich,20 founding member of the German Corona Further-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss,21 or ACU),22,23 Drosten is a key offender within the COVID-19 pandemic hoax.
The scientists demand the Corman-Drosten paper be retracted as a consequence of “deadly errors,”24 one in every of which is the truth that it was written (and the take a look at itself developed) earlier than any viral isolate was accessible. All they used was the genetic sequence printed on-line by Chinese language scientists in January 2020.
The truth that the paper was printed a mere 24 hours after it was submitted additionally suggests it did not even endure peer evaluate. In an Undercover DC interview, Kevin Corbett, Ph.D., one of many 22 scientists who at the moment are demanding the paper’s retraction, said:25
“Each scientific rationale for the event of that take a look at has been completely destroyed by this paper. It is like Hiroshima/Nagasaki to the COVID take a look at.
When Drosten developed the take a look at, China hadn’t given them a viral isolate. They developed the take a look at from a sequence in a gene financial institution. Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. That they had a code, however no physique for the code. No viral morphology.
Within the fish market, it is like providing you with just a few bones and saying ‘that is your fish.’ It may very well be any fish … Hear, the Corman-Drosten paper, there’s nothing from a affected person in it. It is all from gene banks. And the bits of the virus sequence that weren’t there they made up.
They synthetically created them to fill within the blanks. That is what genetics is; it is a code. So, its ABBBCCDDD and also you’re lacking some, what you assume is EEE, so you set it in … That is principally a pc virus.
There are 10 deadly errors on this Drosten take a look at paper … However right here is the underside line: There was no viral isolate to validate what they had been doing. The PCR merchandise of the amplification did not correspond to any viral isolate at the moment. I name it ‘donut ring science.’ There may be nothing on the heart of it. It is all about code, genetics, nothing to do with actuality …
There have since been papers saying they’ve produced viral isolates. However there aren’t any controls for them. The CDC produced a paper in July … the place they stated: ‘Here is the viral isolate.’ Are you aware what they did? They swabbed one individual. One individual, who’d been to China and had chilly signs. One individual. And so they assumed he had [COVID-19] to start with. So, it is all filled with holes, the entire thing.“
The conclusion of the evaluate reads, partly:26
“A choice to acknowledge the errors obvious within the Corman-Drosten paper has the profit to significantly decrease human price and struggling going ahead. Is it not in the very best curiosity of Eurosurveillance to retract this paper? Our conclusion is obvious. Within the face of all of the large PCR-protocol design flaws and errors described right here, we conclude: There may be not a lot of a alternative left within the framework of scientific integrity and accountability.”
The critique in opposition to PCR testing is additional strengthened by a November 20, 2020, examine27 in Nature Communications, which discovered no viable virus in PCR-positive instances at all. The examine evaluated information from 9,865,404 residents of Wuhan, China, who had undergone PCR testing between Might 14 and June 1, 2020.
A whole of 300 examined optimistic however had no signs. Of the 34,424 folks with a historical past of COVID-19, 107 examined optimistic a second time. But, once they did virus cultures on these 407 people who had examined optimistic (both for the first or second time), no stay virus was present in any of them!
Antibody Assessments Are Equally Unreliable
Antibody assessments are additionally turning out to have their share of high quality issues. If in case you have antibodies in opposition to SARS-CoV-2, that might be proof that your immune system efficiently overcame the virus in some unspecified time in the future prior to now. Nevertheless, the COVID-19 antibody take a look at may prove optimistic if in case you have antibodies in opposition to frequent chilly viruses.
June 30, 2020, the CDC admitted that prior publicity to coronaviruses chargeable for the frequent chilly can lead to a optimistic COVID-19 antibody take a look at, even for those who’ve by no means been uncovered to SARS-CoV-2 particularly.28
The saving grace is that research29,30,31 recommend antibodies produced following publicity to coronaviruses that trigger the frequent chilly additionally seem to supply some common and long-lasting resistance in opposition to SARS-CoV-2.
One such examine,32,33 printed Might 14, 2020, within the journal Cell, discovered 70% of samples from sufferers who had recovered from gentle instances of COVID-19 had resistance to SARS-CoV-2 on the T-cell stage, as did 40% to 60% of individuals who had not been uncovered to SARS-CoV-2.
In keeping with the authors, this means there’s “cross-reactive T cell recognition between circulating ‘frequent chilly’ coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2.” In different phrases, for those who’ve recovered from a standard chilly brought on by a specific coronavirus, your humoral immune system might activate once you encounter SARS-CoV-2, thus rendering you proof against COVID-19.
One other examine34 found SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies are solely present in essentially the most extreme instances — about 1 in 5. So, a destructive antibody take a look at does not essentially rule out the likelihood that you’ve got been contaminated and did not get sick. In actual fact, this discovering suggests COVID-19 might really be 5 instances extra prevalent than suspected — and 5 instances much less lethal than predicted.
In a letter to the editor35 printed within the July 1, 2020, subject of American Household Doctor, Drs. Mark Ebell, deputy editor for evidence-based drugs for the journal, and Henry Barry, reviewed among the accessible information, noting that:
“When assessing whether or not sufferers had a earlier an infection and could also be immune, it is very important keep away from false-positives in order that sufferers don’t assume they’re immune when they don’t seem to be.
Desk 1 summarizes the false-positive charges at numerous inhabitants prevalence for the Cellex take a look at and for a hypothetical take a look at that’s 90% delicate and 99% particular. At comparatively low inhabitants prevalences, which seemingly replicate present situations in the USA and elsewhere, we might argue that false-positive charges are unacceptably excessive with the Cellex take a look at.”
Ebell and Barry identified that lots of the antibody tests which have provisional approval from the FDA nonetheless haven’t even been evaluated for accuracy. Additionally they really useful that labs report take a look at outcomes “in a method that displays the native inhabitants prevalence primarily based on widespread testing and embrace the false-positive price,” as this info “is required to assist household physicians higher inform shared decision-making relating to earlier an infection and return to work or faculty.”
At current, you’d be hard-pressed to seek out anybody together with that information of their reporting, and the method issues are going, I would not maintain my breath in anticipation of such useful numbers being included sooner or later both.
Excessive Time to Finish Mass Testing Rip-off
If the huge majority of people that take a look at optimistic for COVID-19 an infection don’t have any signs, do not feel sick and do not look sick, is COVID-19 actually a “lethal” illness? Or, is it extra like HPV — a viral an infection that most individuals have with out figuring out it, and which 90% are in a position to eradicate with out therapy?
The first justification for the tyrannical governmental interventions of COVID-19 was to gradual the unfold of the an infection in order that hospital assets wouldn’t be overwhelmed, inflicting folks to die as a consequence of lack of medical care.
These interventions weren’t about stopping the unfold altogether and even decreasing the variety of folks that might ultimately get contaminated. They definitely had been by no means meant to stop all demise. Any rational evaluation would quickly conclude that this merely is not potential, below any circumstance.
Quick-term stay-at-home orders and enterprise closings had been solely meant to decelerate the unfold so that, ultimately, naturally-acquired herd immunity — the very best form — would stop it from reemerging. But the purpose posts hold shifting as we go alongside.
Two-week lockdowns became months in some areas. Finally, we had been instructed all the things would return to regular as quickly as a vaccine turned accessible. However as soon as the vaccines began rolling out, the narrative modified once more, and we had been instructed we might nonetheless want masks, social distancing and lockdowns properly into 2021 and even 2022 even with a vaccine. What, precisely, is occurring?
The one rational motive for why authorities interventions proceed is as a result of they’re meant to erode our private freedoms and civil liberties and switch wealth to unelected technocrats who’re controlling the pandemic narrative. It is all fearmongering primarily based on a mix of wildly manipulated information and flawed assessments.
Apart from PCR testing information, there is no proof of a deadly pandemic in any respect. As talked about, whereas there may be such a factor as COVID-19, and other people have and do die from it, there aren’t any extra deaths as a consequence of it.36,37,38 The entire mortality for 2020 is regular.
So, except we assume we must always shut down the world and cease dwelling as a result of folks die from coronary heart illness, diabetes, most cancers, the flu or the rest, then there is no motive to close down the world as a result of some folks occur to die from COVID-19.
What You Can Do
The excellent news is the hoax is beginning to be uncovered. In November 2020, a Portuguese appeals courtroom dominated39,40 that the PCR take a look at is “not a dependable take a look at for SARS-CoV-2” and that “a single optimistic PCR take a look at can’t be used as an efficient analysis of an infection.” Subsequently, “any enforced quarantine primarily based on the outcomes is illegal.”41 The courtroom additionally famous that forcing wholesome folks to self-isolate may very well be a violation of their basic proper to liberty.
As detailed in “Coronavirus Fraud Scandal — The Biggest Fight Has Just Begun” and “German Lawyers Initiate Class-Action Coronavirus Litigation,” further authorized instances are additionally to be anticipated, all of which is able to assist expose the fraud perpetrated. As for what you can do within the meantime, think about:
- Turning off mainstream media information and turning to impartial specialists — do the analysis. Learn by the science.
- Proceed to counter the censorship by asking questions — arm your self with mortality statistics and the information on PCR testing, so you’ll be able to clarify how and why this pandemic merely is not a pandemic anymore.
- In case you are a medical skilled, particularly for those who’re a member of an expert society, write an open letter to your authorities, urging them to talk to and heed suggestions from impartial specialists.
- Signal The Great Barrington Declaration,42 which requires an finish to lockdowns.
- Be part of a gaggle so that you simply can have help — Examples of teams fashioned to battle in opposition to authorities overreach embrace Us for Them, a gaggle campaigning for reopening faculties and defending youngsters’s rights within the U.Okay., and the Freedom to Breathe Agency, a U.S. staff of attorneys, medical doctors, enterprise house owners and oldsters who’re preventing to guard freedom and liberty.